Global genetic diversity of measles virus (Paramyxoviridae: Morbillivirus: Morbillivirus hominis): historical aspects and current state

Cover Page


Cite item

Abstract

Monitoring the circulation of the measles virus and studying its genetic diversity is an important component of the measles elimination program. A methodological approach to molecular genetic studies and their interpretation in the measles surveillance was developed in the early 2000s. During its development, clear areas of circulation of each genotype of the virus were identified, therefore, the determination of viruses’ genotypes was proposed to monitor circulation and identify transmission pathways. However, in the future, due to a significant decrease in the number of active genotypes, an approach based on sub-genotyping was proposed: determining not only the genotype of the virus, but also its genetic lineage/genetic variant. The Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (GMRLN) systematically monitors the circulation of the measles virus at the sub-genotypic level, depositing the results in a specialized database MeaNS2. It is this database that is the most complete and reliable source of information about the genetic characteristic of measles viruses.

This review presents both historical information and the latest data on the global genetic diversity of the measles virus.

Full Text

Introduction

Genotyping of measles virus strains, estimation of their circulation timing and their geographic distribution constitute integral components of high-quality epidemiological measles surveillance, which must be implemented in all the countries that have adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) measles control and elimination program [1].

Identification of a measles virus and its assignment to one of the 24 known genotypes as well as identification of the genetic lineage or variants of the isolated virus strains are among the tasks performed by the laboratories participating in the WHO Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (WHO GMRLN). The WHO GMRLN was established in 2000 to provide reliable diagnostic support and to monitor the circulation of pathogens. Its laboratories serve 191 countries and include three global specialized laboratories, 14 regional reference laboratories, 180 national and 506 subnational laboratories [2]. In the Russian Federation, the function of the national laboratory and reference laboratory for CIS countries is assigned to the National and Methodological Center for Measles and Rubella Surveillance of the Gabrichevsky Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology of Rospotrebnadzor.

The WHO GMRLN laboratory consortium provides continuous monitoring of the circulation of the measles virus. Currently, the standard method for genotyping of measles viruses is sequencing of 450 nucleotides (nt) encoding the COOH terminal 150 amino acids of the viral nucleoprotein (the so-called sequencing window) – N-450 [3, 4]. Additionally, the countries where measles has been eliminated or is close to elimination can use extended regions of the virus genome for the analysis, including the full nucleotide sequence of the H gene (1854 nt), the 1018-nt-long non-coding region between the M and F genes (MF-NCR); besides, whole genome sequencing of the virus can be used [5]. While extended sequencing used for genetic monitoring demonstrates good results in studies, it cannot be globally adopted by laboratories due to absence of standardized methods of analysis and interpretation of results [5].

The attempts have been made to develop a genotype-specific reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to be further used in WHO GMRLN laboratories [6]. Assumedly, the technique should have become an alternative to sequencing; however, it did not take hold, as it lacks the capacity to detect mutations and track transmission chains of genetic lineages and variants. The genotype-specific real-time RT-PCR is used exclusively for differentiation between vaccine and wild-type strains in recently vaccinated patients [7, 8].

The results of genotyping of all viruses isolated during the monitoring are deposited in the specialized MeaNS2 database (Measles virus nucleotide surveillance; https://who-gmrln.org/means2) created and maintained by the WHO GMRLN. The MeaNS2 database is an improved version of the previous MeaNS database that operated till 2021. For almost 10 years, the monitoring of the measles virus circulation has been based both on genotyping and subgenotyping: identification of a genetic lineage and a genetic variant of isolated strains. Subgenotyping data must also be deposited [3]. Currently, the MeaNS2 database contains 59,176 measles virus nucleotide sequences of the sequencing window, 256 MF-NCR sequences, 169 H gene sequences, 167 complete genome sequences of the measles virus; based on the MeaNS2 information, a total of 70 genetic lineages and 5.5 thousand genetic variants have been isolated over the monitoring period [9].

The data on genetic characterization of measles viruses are deposited in MeaNS2; they provide the most complete and reliable information, which is used in monitoring of the pathogen circulation and is regularly expanded by all the laboratories participating in the WHO GMRLN.

The aim of this review is to provide up-to-date information on the current nomenclature and global genetic diversity of the measles virus with reference to literature sources and the MeaNS2 database.

Characterization of the measles virus

Based on the classification by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), the measles virus belongs to the family Paramyxoviridae, the genus Morbillivirus, the species Morbillivirus hominis [10]. The virus genome is represented by the single-stranded non-segmented negative-sense RNA; it is about 15.8 thousand nt long and encodes 8 proteins. Six non-overlapping structural genes have linear arrangement and encode 6 structural proteins: nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), fusion protein (F), hemagglutinin (H), polymerase (large protein L). The P gene encodes two additional non-structural proteins, C and V [11]. From the immunological perspective, the most important role belongs to transmembrane viral proteins – H and F as well as to the N protein that forms the ribonucleoprotein complex participating in RNA transcription and translation. N-protein-specific antibodies are produced early in infection; however, long-lasting immunity depends on transmembrane proteins of the measles virus. It has been found that the H protein mediates attachment of the virus to cellular receptors (CD150, nectin-4); the F protein is responsible for membrane fusion and viral genome entry into the cell. Hemagglutinin induces a strong immune response, being the target of neutralizing antibodies that play a critical role in development of post-infection and post-vaccination immunity [12, 13].

It has been found that the 150-amino-acid C-terminal domain of the N protein is the most variable among morbilliviruses [14]. Immunologically, viruses belonging to different genotypes, genetic lineages, or variants did not demonstrate any differences [15, 16].

Historical insight into genetic diversity of the measles virus

Studies of genetic diversity of the measles virus date back to the 1980s. The cumulative data provided the basis for the standardized measles virus nomenclature that was adopted in 1998 and incorporated genetic and geographic characteristics as well as phylogenetic relationships of the virus. At the meeting on measles elimination program, the WHO Expert Committee introduced a unified protocol for the designation of measles genotypes to integrate molecular and genetic monitoring into epidemiological surveillance practices [4].

In the late 1990s, during development and implementation of universal approaches to global molecular and epidemiological studies of the measles virus, it was found that viruses of different genotypes prevailed in different parts of the world. Based on the data available by 1998-2001, the global genetic diversity of the measles virus was represented by eight clades (each clade is designated by a letter of the Latin alphabet: from A to H) containing 15 subclade-genotypes, 11 of which were classified as active [4, 17]. By the time of establishment of the first unified measles virus nomenclature in 2001, inactive genotypes were represented by genotypes F, D1, E, and G. The term “inactive” (“extinct”) genotype means a genotype that has not been detected worldwide for 10 years and longer during monitoring [4].

The recommendations published in 2001 not only offered the first-time systematization and description of the measles virus genetic diversity across the world, but also introduced the unified designation for isolated viruses, which is still used in all countries involved in measles surveillance [17, 18].

The standard designation of measles viruses and their nucleotide sequences is in English and includes the following information [17]:

  1. The source of the sequence – an isolate in cell culture (MVi) or a biological fluid sample from a patient with measles (MVs).
  2. The geographic location where a measles case was reported. The designation of strains isolated in Russia traditionally includes the central city of the region.
  3. The three-letter code of the country in the ISO-3166 format.
  4. The week and year when the case was reported.
  5. The number of the isolate if more than one per week. Special designation for sequences derived from subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) cases; the source of importation if required.

Items 1 through 4 are required for identification of the virus. For example, designation MVi/Perm.RUS/12.09 means that the sequence was derived from the virus isolated in Perm in Russia during the 12th week in 2009.

The second revision of measles virus nomenclature was in 2003. The increased amount of data on the genetic identity of viruses isolated in different countries led to more specific designation of genotypes. Within eight clades, the following genotypes were specified: A, B1–B3, C1–C2, D1–D9, E, F, G1–G3, H1–H2. Out of 22 known genotypes, 16 genotypes were recognized as active in 2003; the list of inactive genotypes was extended, adding two more genotypes – B1 and B2 [19].

The next updating took place in 2005–2006; the 22 known genotypes of the measles virus were joined by one more genotype – D10, while genotype B2 recently detected in West Africa was removed from the list of inactive genotypes [20, 21].

Updated information about the genetic diversity of the virus was published in 2012, including the data on genotype D11 – the most recent 24th recognized genotype [3]. The last revision of the measles virus nomenclature was in 2015 (Table). Based on the updated information, only 6 virus genotypes remain globally active: B3, D4, D8, D9, G3, H1. Considering that the virological surveillance and monitoring of the measles virus circulation had become a routine practice in 135 WHO member countries by the time of the last update on the global genetic diversity of the virus, the scientific community must have had reliable information to assign the other genotypes of wild-type viruses to extinct ones [3, 22].

Theoretically, new genotypes may still emerge. As specified in the measles virus nomenclature introduced by WHO in 2012, the requirements for a new genotype include the presence of N-450 and H gene sequences supported by the data from different cases, the availability of at least one virus isolate; epidemiological significance of the new genotype; the completed phylogenetic analysis including all the available sequences of the N-450 region and the H gene, not being limited to reference sequences; the tentative genotype must not form a cluster with an internal ancestral node within the existing genotype; the branch belonging to the tentative genotype must have bootstrap support greater than 90% with the same topology of phylogenetic trees based on the N-450 and H gene sequences [3, 9, 22].

Subgenotyping of the measles virus for improving surveillance sensitivity

Subgenotyping methods used for identification of a genetic lineage and genetic variant are an integral part of high-quality epidemiological surveillance, having come into practice in 2012. Subgenotyping was initially used for genotypes that were widespread geographically and prevailed in the viral population for a long time. Subgenotyping methods used in epidemiological surveillance were first described for genotypes D4 (countries of Europe, 2007–2011) and B3 (countries of Africa, 2009–2011) [3]. Later, genetic lineages were also identified for other genotypes of the virus; by 2023, the identified lineages included 23 lineages of genotype B3, 10 lineages of genotype D4, 1 lineage of genotype D5, 2 lineages of genotype D6, 26 lineages of genotype D8, 2 lineages of genotype D9, 6 lineages of genotype H1 [9].

 

Table. Genotypes of measles virus, current nomenclature [9, 22]

Таблица. Генотипы вируса кори, действующая номенклатура [9, 22]

Genotype

Генотип

Reference strain

Референс-штамм

Last detected, year, country

Последняя изоляция, год, страна

Status (active/inactive)

Статус (активный/неактивный)

A (VAC)

MVi/Maryland.USA/0.54

2022 / 2022 г.

Active / Активный

B1

MVi/Yaounde.CMR/12.83

2008, France / 2008 г., Франция

Inactive / Неактивный

B2

MVi/Libreville.GAB/0.84

2011, France / 2011 г., Франция

Inactive / Неактивный

B3

MVi/New York.USA/0.94

MVi/Ibadan.NGA/0.97/1

Circulates globally since 2000s /

Глобальная циркуляция с середины 2000-х гг.

Active / Активный

C1

MVi/Tokyo.JPN/0.84

Early 1990s / Начало 1990-х гг.

Inactive / Неактивный

C2

MVi/Maryland.USA/0.77

MVi/Erlangen.DEU/0.90

2004, United Kingdom / 2004 г., Великобритания

Inactive / Неактивный

D1

MVi/Bristol.GBR/0.74

1986, Japan / 1986 г., Япония

Inactive / Неактивный

D2

MVi/Johannesburg.ZAF/0.88/1

2005, Democratic Republic of the Congo/

2005 г., Демократическая Республика Конго

Inactive / Неактивный

D3

MVi/Illinois.USA/0.89/1

2013, USA / 2013 г., США

Inactive / Неактивный

D4

MVi/Montreal.CAN/0.89

2020, India / 2020 г., Индия

Active / Активный

D5

MVi/Palau.PLW/0.93

MVi/Bangkok.THA/12.93/1

2015, China / 2015 г., Китай

Active / Активный

D6

MVi/New Jersey.USA/0.94/1

2007, Kazakhstan / 2007 г., Казахстан

Inactive / Неактивный

D7

MVi/Victoria.AUS/16.85

MVi/Illinois.USA/50.99

2003, United Kingdom / 2003 г., Великобритания

Inactive / Неактивный

D8

MVi/Manchester.GBR/30.94

Circulates globally since 2000s / Глобальная циркуляция с середины 2000-х гг.

Active / Активный

D9

MVi/Victoria.AUS/12.99

2019, Switzerland / 2019 г., Швейцария

Active / Активный

D10

MVi/Kampala.UGA/51.00/1

2005, Democratic Republic of the Congo / 2005 г., Демократическая Республика Конго

Inactive / Неактивный

D11

MVi/Menglian.Yunnan.CHN/47.09

2010, China / 2010 г., Китай

Inactive / Неактивный

E

MVi/Goettingen.DEU/0.71

1987, Germany / 1987 г., Германия

Inactive / Неактивный

F

MVs/Madrid.ESP/0.94 [SSPE]

1994, Spain / 1994 г., Испания

Inactive / Неактивный

G1

MVi/Berkeley.USA/0.83

1984, USA / 1984 г., США

Inactive / Неактивный

G2

MVi/Amsterdam.NLD/49.97

2001, Thailand / 2001 г., Таиланд

Inactive / Неактивный

G3

MVi/Gresik.IDN/18.02

2014, Israel / 2014 г., Израиль

Inactive / Неактивный

H1

MVi/Hunan.CHN/0.93/7

2019, China / 2019 г, Китай

Active / Активный

H2

MVi/Beijing.CHN/0.94/1

2003, Vietnam / 2003 г., Вьетнам

Inactive / Неактивный

 

Measles virus lineages and their genetic variants are smaller taxonomic units compared to genotypes. The genetic variant is a sequence that differs at least by 1 nt from the original genotype or genetic lineage. When viruses belonging to the same genetic variant circulate in several countries for more than 2 years, the genetic variant can form an individual lineage. Each genetic lineage has a representative “designated strain”, which, as a rule, has the same name as the first globally isolated strain [22].

Subgenotyping methods are designed to increase the sensitivity of virological monitoring during epidemiological surveillance. Subgenotyping of the measles virus provides a retrospective insight into the links in the epidemic chain and helps take adequate measures. There can be situations when several genetic variants of the measles virus co-circulate in the same area; then, the information that the pathogens belong to different genetic variants becomes critically important for differentiating of the transmission chains. Alternatively, the identification of identical genetic variants of the pathogen in isolated cases can provide a basis for their combination into a single outbreak (chain), provided that the chain is limited to an incubation period of maximum length (21 days). The measles incidence is analyzed annually across the country, taking genetic characteristics of isolated virus strains into consideration, constituting a key component in confirmation of successful elimination of measles or continuation of its endemic transmission.

Current data on geographic distribution of measles virus genotypes

Clade А viruses

Clade A includes vaccine strains: These are not only strains derived from the original Edmonston strain isolated in 1954 (Moraten, Schwarz, Edmonston-Zagreb, AIK-C strains), but also strains originating from wild-type viruses (Shanghai-191, Chanchun-47, CAM-70, Leningrad-16) [23–25]. The fact that most of the strains used for vaccines were isolated in the middle of the last century can serve as an indirect proof that genotype A had widespread occurrence in the pre-vaccination era. However, the data on the measles virus genetic characteristics, which were available at the time of development of the unified nomenclature, lead to the conclusion that all the cases of genotype А virus isolation from patients were associated with the recent vaccination, but not with the transmission of wild-type viruses [4, 9, 17].

Clade B viruses

Clade B viruses were originally common in African countries. Viruses of genotypes В1 and В2 had limited areas of circulation: Viruses of genotype В1 were detected only in Cameroon, while viruses of genotype В2 – in Gabon. All the currently available strains representing genotypes В1 and В2 were isolated in the 1980s. Genotype В3 viruses were reported to circulate not only in Central Africa, but also in West Africa (Gambia, Ghana, Nigeria) and East Africa (Kenya, Sudan) [4, 17].

Genotypes В1 and В2 are believed to be extinct. The last globally isolated genotype B1 virus was detected in France in 2008; then, there were no reports about its further transmission [26]. In 2011, also in France, the last strain belonging to the B2 genotype was isolated [27].

Genotype В3 was widespread throughout the African continent till the mid-2000s. It was described as endemic for African countries [20, 28, 29]. Later, genotype В3 viruses spread across the world, and currently actively circulate nearly in all countries; the number of records on nucleotide sequences of viruses of this genotype reaches 15,487. Genotype В3 is the only genotype in clade B, which has genetic lineages. The large number of lineages (23 lineages) can be explained by the long circulation of the genotype in various geographic regions. Based on the MeaNS2 data, genotype B3 genetic lineage MVs/Quetta.PAK/44.20 and genetic variants of other genetic lineages are in circulation in the world in 2023 [9].

Clade C viruses

Clade C measles viruses are represented by two genotypes – C1 and C2. Genotype С1 was endemic in Japan till the early 1990s [30] and in Spain [31]. As there was no consistent monitoring of the measles virus until the mid-2000s, we do not have any information about isolated viruses of this genotype in other regions. Measles viruses belonging to genotype С2 were endemic in Europe till the mid-2000s [9, 17, 31–33]. The last wild-type virus belonging to genotype С2 was isolated in Great Britain in 2004 [34]; it was also reported that measles virus C1 strain was isolated from a patient with SSPE in Germany in 2019 [35]. Currently, clade C is considered inactive.

Clade D viruses

The largest and most genetically diverse clade of measles viruses, clade D, includes 11 genotypes. Seven genotypes of the clade are currently not circulating; their transmission either was not documented and therefore viruses of some genotypes are known only retrospectively (genotype D1) or was interrupted (genotypes D2, D3, D7, D10, D11).

There are no data on infection with genotype D1 viruses during the period of active monitoring of the measles virus transmission. Strains of D1 – the oldest genotype in the clade – were isolated only from SSPE cases; all the patients had measles in 1960-1970, thus supporting the fact that the genotype was active during that period [22, 36]. Viruses belonging to genotype D2 were detected in South Africa where they circulated at least till 2005; their transmission in the African region involved occasional exportation of genotype D2 viruses to countries of Europe [17, 22, 37]. Genotype D3 was considered endemic for East Asia until 2003; viruses of this genotype were detected primarily in Japan and China [17, 30, 38]. Viruses of genotype D7 previously endemic in countries of the European region have not circulated since 2003 [9, 17, 39]. It is known that genotype D10 and D11 measles viruses have not been circulating for quite a long time. Sporadic cases associated with genotype D10, were reported in Uganda, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the United Kingdom during 2000–2005 [9, 40]. Genotype D11 caused a measles outbreak in China in 2009–2010 [41].

Measles virus genotypes, representatives of which have not been detected for more than 10 years during global monitoring, can be classified as extinct. However, some genotypes, though have not been detected for a relatively long time, are still considered active, remaining within the 10-year timeframe. For example, endemic in Japan and, possibly, in some other countries of East and Southeast Asia, genotype D5 represented by one genetic lineage MVs/Okinawa.JPN/37.06 was active till 2015; then its global transmission discontinued [9, 30, 42, 43]. Genotype D9 having worldwide occurrence since 2002 is represented by two genetic lineages: MVs/Bristol.GBR/13.05 and MVs/Yamanashi.JPN/51.12. Both lineages circulated primarily in countries of Europe; lineage MVs/Bristol.GBR/13.05 and its genetic variants were active till 2014; viruses belonging to lineage MVs/Yamanashi.JPN/51.12 were in circulation till 2019 [9].

By the time of the adoption of the first unified measles virus nomenclature, genotype D4 had been characterized by worldwide occurrence. In some countries, including Russia, genotype D4 measles viruses have been circulating for a long time [17, 31, 44–48]. The long-lasting and active global transmission of the genotype resulted in its divergence into 10 genetic lineages. Its latest strains belonging to genetic lineage MVs/Manchester.GBR/10.09 were isolated in India in 2020 during the global monitoring [9].

Currently, genotype D8 is the most active globally circulating genotype of viruses. The first strains of the genotype were isolated in the late 1990s; initially, the genotype was recognized as endemic for Africa and India [17]. However, in the later years, viruses of this genotype spread widely throughout the world, and are currently dominating, together with genotype B3, in the global incidence structure. The active transmission of the genotype led to the development of 26 genetic lineages. Based on the MeaNS2 data, two genetic D8 lineages: MVs/Patan.IND/16.19 and MVs/Victoria.AUS/6.11 and their genetic variants are circulating in 2023. In addition, in some countries, genetic variants from other lineages are of epidemiological significance [9].

Clade E and F viruses

During active global molecular and genetic monitoring of the measles virus, no wild-type viruses belonging to clades Е and F were isolated; the identification of the clades was based on the viruses isolated from patients with SSPE [9, 17, 22, 44].

Clade G viruses

Clade G is represented by three genotypes; genotype G1 and G2 viruses have not been circulating since 2001. Previously, genotype G1 viruses were isolated in the United States, while genotype G2 viruses were endemic in Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand) and circulated for a short time in Europe (Germany, the Netherlands) [9, 17, 43, 49].

Genotype G3, which was first isolated from measles cases in Southeast Asia in 2002, circulated at low epidemic levels in countries of the Western Pacific region, the United States, and Western Europe till 2014 [9].

Currently, clade G of measles viruses is not circulating; most likely, it will be classified as extinct.

Clade H viruses

Clade H including two genotypes is recognized as endemic in countries of East Asia, primarily in China [17]. Both genotypes – H1 and H2 – were widespread in China, Vietnam, and South Korea, being actively imported by other countries [9, 17, 46, 50–53]. Genotype H1 is represented by 6 genetic lineages, one of which – lineage MVs/Henan.CHN/9.16/7 – had been active until 2019. There are no data on measles cases associated with clade H genotypes after 2019; since 2020, the incidence in the countries previously endemic for this genotype has been associated with genotypes D8 and B3 [9].

Global subgenotypic characterization of the measles virus

The period of low measles incidence due to restrictive measures aimed at combating the novel coronavirus infection has been followed by a surge in global measles cases. According to the WHO estimates, only 116 cases of measles were reported in Europe in 2021 [54], in 2022 – 903 cases [55], and over 4 months in 2023 – a total of 3,832 cases were reported [56].

For several years, there has been a steady trend towards globalization of the circulation of measles viruses belonging to two genotypes: B3 and D8. In 2021–2023, all the reported cases of measles were caused by viruses of these genotypes [9]. When only two genotypes are represented by circulating viruses, the global genetic diversity cannot be evaluated without subgenotypic characterization of viruses isolated in the world, as molecular and epidemiological studies cannot be based only on the identification of the genotype.

Large-scale measures aimed at infection control and successful measles elimination by many countries led to significant changes in the genetic landscape of the virus. Previously the genetic geography of the virus was understood through the clearly defined areas of circulation of different genotypes; however, over time, the genetic diversity of measles viruses has narrowed down as a natural result of the efforts invested by the global health community in control and elimination of the disease.

The current view of the genetic diversity of measles viruses includes not only genotypes, but also genetic lineages within genotypes as well as genetic variants of these lineages. Lineages and variants of the measles virus are operational taxonomic units used for characterization of the virus circulation during epidemiological surveillance since 2012, having replaced genotypes [3]. Currently, the MeaNS2 database has information about 70 genetic lineages and 5.5 thousand genetic variants of the measles virus. Such approach to the genetic diversity has been adopted due to the epidemiological surveillance of measles and mandatory laboratory tests required for confirmation of the disease; each genetic variant of the virus must be documented and a unique number – DSid (distinct sequence id) must be assigned in MeaNS2 to each new variant.

In 2021–2023, global measles cases were caused by viruses belonging to genotypes D8 and B3. Based on the available data, 1,411 strains belong to genotype D8 and 1,469 strains belong to genotype B3. While in quantitative terms the proportions of cases distributed between genotypes are approximately equal, the divergence level is significantly higher in genotype B3, which was represented by 5 genetic lineages and 319 genetic variants. Genotype D8 is represented by 6 genetic lineages and 136 genetic variants of the virus.

In 2021–2023, lineages D8 MVs/Patan.IND/16.19, MVs/Victoria.AUS/6.11 and MVs/Gir Somnath.IND/42.16 have the greatest epidemiological significance by the time of circulation and the number of isolated strains. Due to active transmission in India, viruses of lineages MVs/Patan.IND/16.19 and MVs/Victoria.AUS/6.11 were repeatedly exported, causing measles outbreaks in many countries that are still affected by them. The transmission of viruses belonging to lineage MVs/Gir Somnath.IND/42.16 discontinued in the middle of 2021; the last large measles outbreak associated with the lineage was reported in Brazil.

Among 228 genetic variants of measles viruses belonging to genotype D8, only 6 contributed significantly to the incidence structure. Long-lasting transmission and wide geographic distribution are generally not typical of genetic variants of the virus, though their possibility exists in the settings of multiple importation. It is known that genetic variant 8248, which is related to lineage MVs/Patan.IND/16.19, was first isolated during the measles outbreak in Tajikistan, which began in 2021. Having been imported from Tajikistan, the genetic variant got to Russia where in 2022–2023 the number of measles cases associated primarily with genetic variant 8248 increased significantly. The circulation of the above variant is maintained in Russia mainly through continued importation of measles from Tajikistan. In addition, sporadic measles cases associated with this variant were reported in Kazakhstan, the Czech Republic, the United Kingdom, and the United States in 2023.

Another genetic variant of lineage D8 MVs/Patan.IND/16.19 – 8348 – circulated in India throughout 2022, and later was also isolated from patients with measles in Sweden and New Zealand. Long-circulating genetic variants related to other lineages were also detected in some countries, mostly in India. Variant 8278 – related to lineage D8 MVi/Hulu Langat.MYS/26.11, variant 8318 – MVi/Delhi.IND/01.14/06, variant 8350 – MVs/London.GBR/21.16/2. Long-lasting local transmission of genetic variants caused their dissemination to other regions, mainly to Western European countries and North America.

Viruses of genetic lineage B3 MVs/Quetta.PAK/44.20, which were first reported in 2020, dominate in the genetic distribution of the genotype and have widespread occurrence mostly in South (Pakistan, Afghanistan) and West Asia (Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE). The active transmission of lineage MVs/Quetta.PAK/44.20 led to emergence of genetic variants 6382, 6464, 6493 that quickly secured their positions in the population. These virus variants circulated for more than one year in regions where their ancestral lineage was prevalent.

In 2020–2023, genetic variant 5631 originating from lineage В3 MVs/Kansas.USA/1.12 significantly contributed to the incidence of measles in different countries. The variant circulates in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia, though sporadic imported measles cases were reported in Turkey and the Netherlands.

Conclusion

The efforts of the global health community aimed at measles control and elimination have led to a gradual reduction in the genetic diversity of the virus. Since 2021, the global genetic landscape of the pathogen has been represented only by the genotype B3 and D8 viruses; currently, the accurate phylogeographic clustering of measles genotypes is out of the question. Subgenotyping has become an important tool of molecular and epidemiological surveillance in the setting of declining diversity and, consequently, the number of genotypes, on the one hand, and the growing number of genetic variants within circulating genotypes, on the other hand. Identification of N-450 sequences in measles viruses and phylogenetic analysis of the data using the MeaNS2 database are essential components of the WHO GMRLN monitoring of virus circulation and locating of circulation areas of genetic lineages and genetic variants. Identification of new lineages and their genetic variants is of critical importance for epidemiological surveillance and for estimation of the status of measles elimination.

×

About the authors

Tatiana S. Rubalskaia

G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow research institute of epidemiology and microbiology Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Author for correspondence.
Email: rubalskaia@gabrich.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0838-7353

head of applied immunochemistry laboratory G.N. Gabrichevsky, research institute of epidemiology and microbiology

Russian Federation, 125212, Moscow

Denis V. Erokhov

G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow research institute of epidemiology and microbiology Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: erokhovdenis@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7163-7840

Researcher of applied immunochemistry laboratory G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow research institute of epidemiology and microbiology

Russian Federation, 125212, Moscow

Polina E. Zherdeva

G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow research institute of epidemiology and microbiology Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: polya-zherdeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7635-4353

junior researcher of applied immunochemistry laboratory G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow research institute of epidemiology and microbiology

Russian Federation, 125212, Moscow

Tamara A. Mamaeva

G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow research institute of epidemiology and microbiology Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: 4522826@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2320-1062

Ph.D. (Biol.), Lead researcher of applied immunochemistry laboratory G.N. Gabrichevsky, research institute of epidemiology and microbiology

Russian Federation, 125212, Moscow

Nina T. Tikhonova

G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow research institute of epidemiology and microbiology Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: tikhmail@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8762-4355

Professor, Dr.Sci. (Biol.), Chief researcher of cytokines laboratory G.N. Gabrichevsky, research institute of epidemiology and microbiology

Russian Federation, 125212, Moscow

References

  1. Measles: Vaccine Preventable Diseases Surveillance Standards. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/vaccine-preventable-diseases-surveillance-standards-measles
  2. Mulders M.N., Rota P.A., Icenogle J.P., Brown K.E., Takeda M., Rey G.J., Ben Mamou M.C., Dosseh A.R., Byabamazima C.R., Ahmed H.J., Pattamadilok S., Zhang Y., Gacic-Dobo M., Strebel P.M., Goodson J.L. Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network Support for Elimination Goals, 2010–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 May 6; 65(17): 438–42. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6517a3
  3. Measles virus nomenclature update: 2012. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2012 Mar 2; 87(9): 73–81. English, French. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WER8709
  4. Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI). Standardization of the nomenclature for describing the genetic characteristics of wild-type measles viruses. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1998 Aug 28; 73(35): 265–9. English, French. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WER7335
  5. The role of extended and whole genome sequencing for tracking transmission of measles and rubella viruses: report from the Global Measles and Rubella laboratory Network meeting, 2017. Weekly Epidemiological Record, 2018, 93(6): 55–59. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WER9306
  6. Kremer J.R., Fack F., Olinger C.M., Mulders M.N., Muller C.P. Measles virus genotyping by nucleotide-specific multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jul; 42(7): 3017–22. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.7.3017-3022.2004
  7. Tran T., Kostecki R., Catton M., Druce J. Utility of a Stressed Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Identification of Measles Vaccine Strains in Patient Samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jul 26; 56(8): e00360–18. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00360-18
  8. Roy F., Mendoza L., Hiebert J., McNall R.J., Bankamp B., Connolly S., Lüdde A., Friedrich N., Mankertz A., Rota P.A., Severini A. Rapid Identification of Measles Virus Vaccine Genotype by Real-Time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Mar; 55(3): 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01879-16
  9. MeaNS2: Measles Virus Nucleotide Surveillance. Available at: https://who-gmrln.org/means2
  10. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses: ICTV. Official Taxonomic Resources. Available at: https://ictv.global/taxonomy/taxondetails?taxnode_id=202201616
  11. ViralZone: a knowledge resource to understand virus diversity. Hulo C, de Castro E, Masson P, Bougueleret L, Bairoch A, Xenarios I, Le Mercier P. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan; 39: D576–82. Available at: https://viralzone.expasy.org/
  12. de Swart R.L., Yüksel S., Osterhaus A.D. Relative contributions of measles virus hemagglutinin- and fusion protein-specific serum antibodies to virus neutralization. J Virol. 2005 Sep; 79(17): 11547–51. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.17.11547-11551.2005
  13. WHO immunological basis for immunization series: module 7: measles: update 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241516655
  14. Shu Y., Habchi J., Costanzo S., Padilla A., Brunel J., Gerlier D., Oglesbee M., Longhi S. Plasticity in structural and functional interactions between the phosphoprotein and nucleoprotein of measles virus. J Biol Chem. 2012 Apr 6; 287(15): 11951–67. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.333088
  15. Riddell M.A., Rota J.S., Rota P.A. Review of the temporal and geographical distribution of measles virus genotypes in the prevaccine and postvaccine eras. Virol J. 2005 Nov 22; 2: 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-87
  16. Kühne M., Brown D.W., Jin L. Genetic variability of measles virus in acute and persistent infections. Infect Genet Evol. 2006 Jul; 6(4): 269–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2005.08.003
  17. Nomenclature for describing the genetic characteristics of wild-type measles viruses (update). Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2001 Aug 17; 76(33): 249–51. English, French. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WER7633
  18. Shulga S.V., Tsvirkun O.V., Tikhonova N.T., Chekhlyaeva T.S., Gerasimova A.G., Mamaeva T.A. et al. Methodological recommendations МР 3.1.2.0135–18. Genetic monitoring of the circulation of measles and rubella viruses. Мoscow; 2019. Available at: https://pdf.standartgost.ru/catalog/Data2/1/4293730/4293730377.pdf (In Russ.)
  19. Update of the nomenclature for describing the genetic characteristics of wild-type measles viruses: new genotypes and reference strains. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2003 Jul 4; 78(27): 229–32. English, French. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WER7827
  20. WHO. New genotype of measles virus and update on global distribution of measles genotypes. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2005 Oct 7; 80(40): 347–51. English, French. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WER8040
  21. Global distribution of measles and rubella genotypes--update. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2006 Dec 15; 81 (51/52): 474–9. English, French. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WER8151
  22. Genetic diversity of wild-type measles viruses and the global measles nucleotide surveillance database (MeaNS). Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015 Jul 24; 90(30): 373–80. English, French. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WER9030
  23. Ignatyev G.M, Atrasheuskaya Е.V., Sukhanova L.L. et al. Molecular genetic analysis of the strain Leningrad-16 used for the production of measles vaccine. Zhurnal Mikrobiologii, Epidemiologii, i Immunobiologii. 2020; 97(2): 182–189. https://doi.org/10.36233/0372-9311-2020-97-2-182-189 (In Russ.)
  24. Parks C.L., Lerch R.A., Walpita P., Wang H.P., Sidhu M.S., Udem S.A. Analysis of the noncoding regions of measles virus strains in the Edmonston vaccine lineage. J Virol. 2001 Jan; 75(2): 921–33. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.2.921-933.2001
  25. Parks C.L., Lerch R.A., Walpita P., Wang H.P., Sidhu M.S., Udem S.A. Comparison of predicted amino acid sequences of measles virus strains in the Edmonston vaccine lineage. J Virol. 2001 Jan; 75(2): 910–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.2.910-920.2001
  26. Waku-Kouomou D., Freymuth F., du Châtelet I.P., Wild T.F., Horvat B. Co-circulation of multiple measles virus genotypes during an epidemic in France in 2008. J Med Virol. 2010 May; 82(6): 1033–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.21766
  27. Mortamet G., Dina J., Freymuth F., Guillois B., Vabret A. Measles in France. Arch. Pediatr. 2012; 19(11): 1269–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2012.08.006 (in French)
  28. Kouomou D.W., Nerrienet E., Mfoupouendoun J., Tene G., Whittle H., Wild T.F. Measles virus strains circulating in Central and West Africa: Geographical distribution of two B3 genotypes. J Med Virol. 2002 Nov; 68(3): 433–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.10222
  29. Haddad-Boubaker S., Rezq M., Smeo M.N., Ben Yahia A., Abudher A., Slim A., Ben Ghorbel M., Ahmed H., Rota P., Triki H. Genetic characterization of clade B measles viruses isolated in Tunisia and Libya 2002-2009 and a proposed new subtype within the B3 genotype. Virus Res. 2010 Nov; 153(2): 258–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2010.08.011
  30. Takahashi M., Nakayama T., Kashiwagi Y., Takami T., Sonoda S., Yamanaka T., Ochiai H., Ihara T., Tajima T. Single genotype of measles virus is dominant whereas several genotypes of mumps virus are co-circulating. J Med Virol. 2000 Oct; 62(2): 278–85.
  31. Mosquera M.M., Ory F., Echevarría J.E. Measles virus genotype circulation in Spain after implementation of the national measles elimination plan 2001-2003. J Med Virol. 2005 Jan; 75(1): 137–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20248
  32. de Swart R.L., Yüksel S., Langerijs C.N., Muller C.P., Osterhaus A. Depletion of measles virus glycoprotein-specific antibodies from human sera reveals genotype-specific neutralizing antibodies. J Gen Virol. 2009 Dec; 90(Pt 12): 2982–2989. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.014944-0
  33. Santibanez S., Heider A., Gerike E., Agafonov A., Schreier E. Genotyping of measles virus isolates from central Europe and Russia. J Med Virol. 1999 Jul; 58(3): 313–20
  34. Lam T., Ranjan R., Newark K., Surana S., Bhangu N., Lazenbury A., et al. A recent surge of fulminant and early onset subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) in the United Kingdom: An emergence in a time of measles. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2021; 34: 4–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2021.07.006
  35. Junker A., Wozniak J., Voigt D., Scheidt U., Antel J., Wegner C., et al. Extensive subpial cortical demyelination is specific to multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2020; 30(3): 641–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12813
  36. Jin L., Beard S., Hunjan R., Brown D.W., Miller E. Characterization of measles virus strains causing SSPE: a study of 11 cases. J Neurovirol. 2002 Aug; 8(4): 335–44. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13550280290100752
  37. Riddell M.A., Moss W.J., Hauer D., Monze M., Griffin D.E. Slow clearance of measles virus RNA after acute infection. J Clin Virol. 2007 Aug; 39(4): 312–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2007.05.006
  38. Cheng W.Y., Lee L., Rota P.A., Yang D.C. Molecular evolution of measles viruses circulated in Taiwan 1992-2008. Virol J. 2009 Dec 10; 6: 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-6-219
  39. Atrasheuskaya A.V., Kulak M.V., Neverov A.A., Rubin S., Ignatyev G.M. Measles cases in highly vaccinated population of Novosibirsk, Russia, 2000-2005. Vaccine. 2008 Apr 16; 26(17): 2111–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.028
  40. Riddell M.A., Rota J.S., Rota P.A. Review of the temporal and geographical distribution of measles virus genotypes in the prevaccine and postvaccine eras. Virol J. 2005 Nov 22; 2: 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-87
  41. Zhang Y., Ding Z., Wang H., Li L., Pang Y., Brown K.E., Xu S., Zhu Z., Rota P.A., Featherstone D., Xu W. New measles virus genotype associated with outbreak, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Jun; 16(6): 943–7. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1606.100089
  42. Horm S.V., Dumas C., Svay S., Feldon K., Reynes J.M. Genetic characterization of wild-type measles viruses in Cambodia. Virus Res. 2003 Nov;97(1):31-7. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(03)00219-3
  43. Pattamadilok S., Incomserb P., Primsirikunawut A., Lukebua A., Rota P.A., Sawanpanyalert P. Genetic characterization of measles viruses that circulated in Thailand from 1998 to 2008. J Med Virol. 2012 May; 84(5): 804–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.23249
  44. Tipples G.A., Gray M., Garbutt M., Rota P.A. Canadian Measles Surveillance Program. Genotyping of measles virus in Canada: 1979-2002. J Infect Dis. 2004 May 1; 189 Suppl 1: S171–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/377716
  45. Kokotas S.N., Bolanaki E., Sgouras D., et al. Cocirculation of genotypes D4 and D6 in Greece during the 2005 to 2006 measles epidemic. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Sep; 62(1): 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Jul 14
  46. Shulga S.V., Tikhonova N.T., Naumova М.А. et al. Changes in the spectrum of circulating virus genotypes as an indicator of elimination of indigenous measles in Russia. Epidemiologiya i vakcinoprofilaktika. 2009; 4: 4–9. (In Russ.)
  47. Vaidya S.R., Chowdhury D.T. Measles virus genotypes circulating in India, 2011-2015. J Med Virol. 2017 May; 89(5): 753–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.24702
  48. Zhuravleva Y.N., Lugovcev V.Y., Voronina O.L. et al. Genetic analysis of wild strains of measles virus isolated in the European part of the Russian Federation. Voprosy virusologii. Вопросы вирусологии. 2003; 48(4): 29–35. (In Russ.)
  49. Santibanez S., Tischer A., Heider A., et al. Rapid replacement of endemic measles virus genotypes. J Gen Virol. 2002 Nov; 83(Pt 11): 2699–2708. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-83-11-2699
  50. Zhang Y., Zhu Z., Rota P.A., et al. Molecular epidemiology of measles viruses in China, 1995-2003. Virol J. 2007 Feb 5; 4: 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-4-14
  51. Cheng W.Y., Wang H.C., Wu H.S., et al. Measles surveillance in Taiwan, 2012-2014: Changing epidemiology, immune response, and circulating genotypes. J Med Virol. 2016 May; 88(5): 746–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.24392
  52. Kremer J.R., Nguyen G.H., Shulga S.V., et al. Genotyping of recent measles virus strains from Russia and Vietnam by nucleotide-specific multiplex PCR. J Med Virol. 2007 Jul; 79(7): 987–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20827
  53. Rota P.A., Liffick S.L., Rota J.S., Katz R.S., Redd S., Papania M., Bellini W.J. Molecular epidemiology of measles viruses in the United States, 1997-2001. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Sep; 8(9): 902–8. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0809.020206
  54. WHO EpiBrief: a report on the epidemiology of selected vaccine-preventable diseases in the European Region: No. 1/2022. Available at: https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2022-6771-46537-67504
  55. WHO EpiBrief: a report on the epidemiology of selected vaccine-preventable diseases in the European Region: No. 1/2023. Available at: https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2023-7691-47458-69761
  56. A monthly summary of the epidemiological data on selected vaccine-preventable diseases in the WHO European Region. Available at: https://www.who.int/europe/publications/m/item/epidata-5-2023

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Rubalskaia T.S., Erokhov D.V., Zherdeva P.E., Mamaeva T.A., Tikhonova N.T.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-77676 от 29.01.2020.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies