Hepatitis B Virus (Hepadnaviridae: Orthohepadnavirus: Hepatitis B virus) among Hospitalized Mentally Disabled Patients is not transmitted by their nurses or family members

Full Text

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a public health is­sue worldwide. It is estimated that nearly two billion peo­ple globally have serological evidence of past or present HBV infection [1]. The natural course of HBV infection can be determined by the interactions between the host and the virus [2].

The patients hospitalized in care centers for the mentally disabled are at a higher risk of hepatitis B (HBV) infection compared to the general population [3]. In 1994, a study from Spain [4] reported the prevalence of HBV as 23.3% in a care center for the mentally disabled patients. More­over, another study conducted in Spain in 2000 [5], with the aim of determining the prevalence of HBV in the pa­tients who were hospitalized for a long period in mentally disabled care centers, showed that 81.3% of patients were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).

In another study conducted in 2003 in Iran [6], the prevalence of HBsAg was estimated as 4% among the mentally disabled patients from five care centers. In agreement with the results of studies performed earlier in other countries, it was confirmed that the prevalence of HBsAg in the institutionalized mentally disabled patients was higher than the general population of Iran.

The world can be divided into three regions in terms of the HBV prevalence as follows: regions with high en- demicity, moderate endemicity, and low endemicity [7]. Perinatal infection is the main route of transmission in high-prevalence areas, whereas horizontal transmission, especially in early childhood, is considered as the main route in regions with a moderate prevalence [8]. The pres­ence of HBV DNA in the saliva, sweat, and urine of the HBV-infected patients is certain and dermal or non-der- mal transmission is highly probable in the patient’s fam­ily [7].

In Iran, a vaccination program is applied for the pa­tient’s family members; however, there is no specific program for screening the patients with HBV, even for their family members. Accordingly, most patients are diagnosed by chance or after blood transfusion. This unawareness leads to failure in observing the necessary precautions for preventing the transmission of HBV and the high prevalence of positive HBV among their family members [9].

So far in Iran, few studies have been conducted on the family members of the patients with HBV, all of which applied serological methods. Moreover, diseases that are communicable through blood and bodily fluids, are considered as a risk to people attending these centers [10]. In all previous studies, the highest rate of positive HBsAg was observed among the surgical department staff or those with a needle stick history [11]. Other studies in­cluded people who never received HBV vaccination, but had positive HbsAb [10]. In a study performed on noso­comial HBV infection, it has been shown that almost half of the people who are at a high risk of HBV in the health system, are not immune to it [10]. Therefore, attendees of care centers for the mentally handicapped patients are always at the risk of HBV, and to decrease this risk factor, HBV vaccination is essential [11][12].

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prev­alence of hepatitis B virus infection in nurses and family members of the mentally handicapped patients, and also to determine the possible transmission way of HBV in­fection among the mentally disabled patients.

Material and methods

Study population

This cross-sectional study included nurses of children hospitalized in care centers for the mentally handicapped patients, as well as the children’s family members. Blood samples of 110 nurses and family members of the hospi­talized children were collected from these five mentally handicapped care centers in different districts of Tehran. Written informed consent was acquired from each person who was willing to participate in the study. The current study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of medical sciences.

Nurses were selected from five districts of Tehran who had contacts with HBV-positive children and were in­cluded based on a previous study by our research team [13].

Sample collection

A 5-mL blood sample was obtained from the partici­pants. The serum of blood samples was isolated and then stored at -20 °C. The required arrangements for sampling were made through frequent phone calls and meetings with the center managers. The questionnaire obtained from the participants included information such as sex, age, marital status, number of children, occupation, du­ration of service at the centers, history of surgery, history of blood transfusion, history of liver disease, HBV infec­tion, and history of HBV vaccination.

Serological and molecular laboratory tests

Serological and molecular tests were performed on the serum samples. Presence of HBsAg (bioELISA HBsAg 3.0, Barcelona, Spain) and HBcAb (bioELISA HBcAb, Barcelona, Spain) were monitored using ELISA assay. After extracting viral nucleic acid (high pure viral nucleic acid kit, Roche, Germany), those samples with positive results from ELISA tests (HBsAg or HBcAb) were submitted to detect HBV DNA using homemade nested PCR technique [14] with specific primers. Also, positive PCR samples were sequenced using an Applied Biosystems Inc. sequencer by 2^nd round PCR specified primers. The sequences acquired in the FASTA format as chromatogram curves were analyzed by BioEdit 7.0.0. Then, the sequences were compared with the reference viral genomes, which had been derived from GenBank. The predicted protein sequence of HBsAg from the sam­ples was determined by translating these sequences using BioEdit software. The genomic sequence of 78 HBVs was selected from various GenBank genotypes, and the phylogenetic tree of HBV was also prepared using Me­ga 6.0 and neighbor-joining method.

Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 19 was used for data entry and perform­ing statistical analysis. Descriptive data are presented as mean deviation or percentage. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to comparing nominal data. In ad­dition, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare nu­merical data in terms of data distribution, and t-test was applied for independent variables. A P value of < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

The HBsAg test was performed for all 102 nurses who agreed to participate in this study including 89 (87%) women and 13 (13%) men. 73.6% of the individuals were married and 26.4% - unmarried. Also, 0.9% of them had no contact with the patients, 41.8% had less than five con­tacts, 11.8% had between five and ten contacts, 16,4% had between ten and 15 contacts, and 29.1% had more than 15 contacts. Addiction (0.9%), blood transfusion (8.8%), surgery (56.7%), hepatitis (11%), and vaccination (64.5%) were the risk factors in this research.

75% and 25% of nurses were under and over 50 years old, respectively. Three (3%) nurses were positive for this antigen, and all of them were female (100%). No pos­itive cases of HBsAg were reported among the family members. There was no significant relationship between positive HBsAg and nurses’ service time at the centers (P< 0.05). Also, there was no significant relationship be­tween the prevalence of HBsAg with the risk factors and the number of patients in contact with a nurse (P< 0.05). The highest prevalence of HBsAg infection among nurs­es was reported to be in center No. 2 in northern Teh­ran. Out of 25 nurses working at this center, three (12 of the total) tested positive for this antigen. There was no significant relationship between the presence of HBsAg and the location of the center (P < 0.05). HBcAb test was performed for all 102 nurses, eight (8%) of whom tested positive for this antibody (25% male and 75% female); and, on the other hand, 94 (92%) nurses tested negative.

In this study, only four out of 20 mentally disabled people at care centers had families; three consented to participate in the study. All of the family members were under 50 years old and had a negative HBsAg test. There was no significant relationship between positive HBsAg and the duration of the patient’s contact with his/her fam­ily (P< 0.05). Also, there was no positive case of HBcAb among the family members.

Nested PCR assay was performed using specific in­ternal and external primers for viral surface protein. In examining 3 HBsAg-positive and 8 HBcAb-positive samples using specific primers of HBV surface genome, only one HBcAb-positive sample was identified, which showed a specific band in the analysis of the PCR product via electrophoresis. This sample was diagnosed as occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) based on the HBsAg negative, HBcAb positive, and detectable HBV DNA.

With bidirectional sequencing of the derived HBV ge­nome and its phylogenetic analysis, genotype D, sub-geno­types D1 and ayw₂ subtype were revealed (Fig. 1). BioEdit analysis of the derived sequence indicated no nucleotide or amino acid changes in comparison with a reference se­quence, thus no nucleotide mutations were reported.

 

 

Discussion

Several reports have revealed the higher prevalence of HBV infection in mentally disabled patients compared to the general population (4-6). It has been also shown that the risk of positive HBsAg in the mentally disabled people at care centers is much higher than in the patients living at home [15]. A meta-analysis performed by Salehi-Vaziri in 2016 reported that the prevalence of HBV infection in the general Iranian population was 2.2 % [16], while an­other study showed 7.0% HBV infection in hospitalized mentally disabled patients [13]. In a study on mentally disabled patients at care centers in Brazil, it was indicated that 12.9% showed HBV infection, while 9.2% had occult HBV infection (OBI) [17]. This study confirms the higher prevalence of infection among mentally disabled patients compared to the general population. It is notable that in these studied centers, each nurse was responsible for more than one patient. In our study, there was no signif­icant relationship between the prevalence of HBsAg and the number of patients in contact with a nurse. Therefore, if the contacts between the patient and nurse are not sani­tized and there is a risk of contact with the patient’s blood and body fluids, HBV transmission is possible among the attendees. This issue was addressed in a study conduct­ed on HBV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the United States in 2012, which has analysed HBV and HIV transmissions among the mentally disabled people and staff of care centers. Absence of HBV vaccination, risk-reduction education, access to birth control methods and regular screening for blood-borne infections were the key factors for spreading the infection [18].

There was also a study on people with intellectual dis­ability in Iran in 2019. It concluded that the frequency of HBV infection in disabled patients was higher than in the general Iranian population (blood donors) [19]. In this study, derived HBV strain showed an indigenous genotype D1 which was matched with other reported Mediterranean and Iranian strains. The high frequency of immune escape strains, despite vaccination and detection of identical mu­tations in different genes, might represent that the persons with intellectual disability have shared drug-resistant and vaccine-escape HBV strains [13]. As the prevalence of HBV infection was reported high in mentally disabled pa­tients, we assumed that the prevalence of HBV infection would also be high in the parents and caregivers of these patients as well. Therefore in this study, 102 blood sam­ples were collected from the nurses at five care centers in

Tehran, Iran. Overall, 3% were HBsAg positive, which indicated the higher prevalence of HBV among nurses compared to the general population, while another study reported a prevalence of 1.7-2.1% [17]. The greater risk of HBV infection had been earlier reported among nurs­es [12][20]. In another study on hospital nurses in Fars province, Iran, a higher risk was reported for acquiring HBV infection compared to the general population (5% were HBsAg positive, while 12% were HBcAb positive) [21]. Therefore, they had reported an intense program for education, vaccination, and post-vaccination assessment that is compulsory for health care workers.

Based on the serological analysis, 6% of nurses tested positive for HBcAb. Positive HBcAb indicates exposure to virus among these nurses; however, as HBV DNA was negative, they recovered after the infection. A study per­formed in 2000 showed that 35% of the general popula­tion of Iran had a positive record of HBcAb. This figure has declined in recently conducted studies. On the other hand, in a study by Merat et al. [22] on people in the age range of 18-65 years old in three major cities of Iran, the prevalence rate of HBcAb was estimated as 16.4%. Lower HBcAb levels can be explained by the execution of the HBV vaccination program in Iran since 1994. Ac­cordingly, exposure of nurses to HBV showed a reduction in comparison with the general population.

In our previous study, we discovered HBV infection in 8% of the mentally disabled patients [23]. The present study, which was conducted on nurses caring for the same patients, showed an infection rate of 3%, which indicates a strict control of the HBV prevalence among the staff.

In the present study, HBV DNA isolated from the blood sample of one nurse showed negative HBsAg and positive HbcAb, which indicated OBI and also suggest­ed that nurses are at a high risk of both chronic HBV and OBI infections. It can be concluded that nurses are at a higher risk of HBV and should be frequently ex­amined by HBsAb test. If nurses do not have adequate immunity, they should be vaccinated against this virus. Monitoring this high-risk group and conducting regular tests can be effective in controlling the prevalence of HBV. However, increasing awareness of HBV infection among the population has been reported to recently improve the community health. For instance, in a study in South Asia in 2013, a total of 156 nurses were ex­amined, 15 of whom tested HBsAg negative and HB- cAb positive, while two tested HBsAg positive (0.01%) [24]. Moreover, in a study in Libya, the prevalence rates of HBsAg, HbcAb, and HBV DNA were 1.8%, 8.5%, and 0.9%, respectively. Lower chronic infection among compared to the general population can be explained by nurses awareness on HBV transmission, knowledge of infection control measures and access to a free vac­cination program [25]. Occult HBV infection provides an opportunity of progression to carcinoma and cirrho­sis for the patient and has not been reported previously among nurses caring for mentally disabled patients. A higher prevalence of HBV infection among the health­care workers who are in contact with mentally disabled patients has been addressed in this research. Therefore, HBV infection screening (including classic and occult) among this group is suggested.

On the other hand, blood samples were collected from three families of patients with HBV. Few studies have been conducted in the past on the HBV-infected patients’ fami­lies, confirming virus transmission among family members by considering the homology of isolated viruses [8]. How­ever, in our study, information was limited due to the lack of cooperation of many families. In serological tests, no positive samples were found in terms of HBsAg or HBcAb among family members, which implies that neither classic nor occult infection was observed in this population. The limited number of individuals participating in the research and separate living places of the patients and their families due to hospitalization from early years of life can be con­sidered as the interferer (influential) factors.

The phylogenetic studies imply that subgenotype D1 has been introduced as the dominant strain reported in Iran, Turkey, and Pakistan [26]. This subgenotype has been described as the dominant strain of genotype D in the Middle East. Therefore, HBV is slightly heteroge­neous in this region, and the virus has not spread for a long time in this population. Moreover, it seems that genotype D has the highest degree of inter-genotype and subgenotype variations, compared to genotypes A, G and F [27]. However, the HBV genome isolated in this study has no change compared to the reference virus ge­nome; and this finding is in accordance with other Irani­an studies [28]. One of the reasons for viral change may be the time of virus entrance to the body. If the virus enters the patient’s body during childhood, it can oppose the immune system, and the virus undergoes changes. Since the virus did not change in our study, it might have recently entered the nurse’s body, which may lead to limited contact with the immune system pressure and limited mutations as well.

In the present study, subtype ayw2 was observed, which is one of the prevalent subtypes reported in genotype D. Observation of different subtypes can indicate great vi­ral changes [29]. Studies performed in many countries have confirmed the presence of genotype D1 with sub­type ayw2 [30]. Furthermore, there are many reports from the Middle East, indicating subtypes ayw2 and awy3 [28][31][32]. Also in Iran, this subtype has been reported in subgenotype D1 [28][29][33].

As many hypotheses were mentioned in this study, the main cause of the high prevalence of HBV infec­tion in mentally disabled patients is still unclear. Un­fortunately, due to many obstacles such as non-cooper­ation of family members and nurses and inaccessibility to family records of many patients (because they were orphans), there is inadequate data to strongly support any of our hypotheses. Despite all of these obstacles, there has been little evidence in our results that can support the connection between nurses and patients’ HBV infection. Nevertheless, further studies, espe­cially on family members and hospitalization quality, are suggested to clarify the source of infection in these children, and consequently to find a way to alleviate this infection among them.

Conclusion

In the present study, the HBV infection rate among the nurses caring for mentally disabled patients was 3%, which is higher than the general Iranian population (1.2-1.7%). On the other hand, 8% of them tested pos­itive for HbcAb. However, there were no positive cases in terms of HBsAg, HBcAb, or HBV DNA in the family members of the mentally disabled patients, which were lower than among the general population. The interferer factors include a limited number of participants (as most hospitalized patients were orphan) and separate living environments of the patients and their family members. The isolated virus from nurse contained genotype D1 and subtype ayw2, which is the most common strain in Mid­dle Eastern countries like Iran. Moreover, no drug-resis­tant or vaccine-escape mutations were observed among HBV-isolated strain.

About the authors

H. Sarbandi

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3243-9803
Tehran Иран

S. M. Hosseini

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8906-5833
Tehran Иран

K. Vakili

Student Research committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7296-3218
Tehran Иран

M. Fathi

Student Research committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4811-3982
Tehran Иран

N. V. Deravi

Student Research committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6965-6927
Tehran Иран

M. Vaezjalali

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3370-7566
Tehran Иран

References

Supplementary files